Necronomicon book of dead names
Final Wordsįanatics from all over the world have given themselves the task of investigating and searching for the aforementioned book but, if found, the details of their reading have not been revealed. The Simon version of the Necronomicon claims to be a Sumerian grimoire, translated from a Greek manuscript for us to read. Later, it was released as a paperback, reaching a much wider readership. It was first published by the Magickal Childe, one of New York’s more famous occult shops, in 1977, in a deluxe leather-bound edition. The most widely-read version is written by ‘Simon’. A few writers capitalized on this belief, printing their own Necronomicons to satisfy the demand. To say, Lovecraft blurs the lines between real and fictional works, and the various allusions to the Necronomicon in fiction has caused a belief amongst some that there exists somewhere a true copy of the horrible book. The two created a Lovecraftian circle of their own with their hilarious homage to the original. This tribute to Lovecraft was meant to summon horrifying demons and other dark creatures, and was featured in a range of works by Gaiman and Pratchett. In Latin it is called ‘Liber Paginarum Fulvarum’ which translates to ‘The Book of Yellow Pages’. As the name may suggest, it is a book for the dead. Established in 1976 ― almost 40 years after Lovecraft’s death ― the press printed works of endless Lovecraftian and Necronomicon inspired authors and writers.įamous horror writer Neil Gaiman included hints to the Necronomicon in many of his works, and collaborated with Terry Pratchett to create the Necrotelicomnicon. The idea of this fearsome book also led to the creation of the Necronomicon Press, a small publishing house based in Rhode Island. He made references to the dreaded book, keeping the legacy alive. Derleth combined his own imagination with Lovecraft’s. There are supposed to be ‘a thousand and one’ ways of how it originated in the Middle East, passing through the Greek and Latin world to be translated, managed and inherited to Modern Europe, later arriving in America and unleashing a cult both strange and dangerous.Īfter Lovecraft’s death in 1937, his close friend and writer, August Derleth continued Lovecraft’s legacy with his contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos. Such demonic material, to this day, remains a mystery, which may be a good thing! The book was over 1000 pages long, and there are no known surviving copies. Thanks to these notes, we have been able to generate a map that addresses the original author of the real Necronomicon, not to the novelization of the American Abdul Al-Hazred and other pertinent notes have been found to have been created by the astrologer Abu ‘Ali al-Hasan or by the Jewish mystic Alhazen ben Joseph. In addition, in his biography, Lovecraft himself seems to leave the data necessary for a more complex tracing of the diabolical work. A fact that has not convinced researchers of the paranormal too much because much of what the writer portrays mysteriously coincides with other facts and assumptions of the occult. However, Lovercraft repeatedly insisted that both the book and the names used in his novel are fictitious, and he himself created them.
If so, Lovecraft would be hiding a fantastic tool with enough information to reveal the horrific origins of humanity, the dark rituals practiced there and other studies of the occult. Lovecraft, author of several ghost stories and diabolical dye, mostly recognized for his stories about Cthulhu Mythos, but also recalled by the alleged creation of “The Necronomicon”, and for having deep knowledge about the original Necronomicon.Īccording to the genial mind of this man of letters, the Necronomicon does not exist on the planet Earth of truth, it was invented by him and nothing else. The scandal began with the American writer H.P. Lovecraft taken in 1934 at the age of 44 © Wikimedia Commons The Origin Of The Necronomicon Portrait of H.
Quite strange for a book that is said to be false according to others, is not it? A sector of these consultants and stakeholders asserts that this object has never existed more than in the narrative imagination, trying to deny any data or suspicion of their whereabouts.
Therefore, there are political and religious organizations behind any trace that may indicate their whereabouts.